Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1838c/1838cdf26d1a273bfc0958872d51c3945bf812d1" alt="Olympus E-3 front Olympus E-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49476/49476823376bf1f79d845d8994f5bd8b0081bd2b" alt="Olympus SP-590 UZ front Olympus SP-590 UZ front"
72 Imaging
34 Features
38 Overall
35
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Introduced February 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-1
- Replacement is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Launched January 2009
- Successor is Olympus SP-600 UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Olympus E-3 and Olympus SP-590 UZ, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are manufactured by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the SP-590 UZ (12MP) is fairly similar but the E-3 (Four Thirds) and SP-590 UZ (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-3 was revealed 10 months before the SP-590 UZ so they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus SP-590 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the E-3 scores against the SP-590 UZ in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-3 & Olympus SP-590 UZ. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Olympus SP-590 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Olympus SP-590 UZ
E-3 | SP-590 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-590 UZ over the Olympus E-3
SP-590 UZ | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2009 | ![]() | February 2008 | More modern by 10 months |
Display dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Olympus SP-590 UZ
E-3 | SP-590 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal display resolution |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera, you should think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-3 offers outer dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") along with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-590 UZ has specifications of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") and a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-3 and Olympus SP-590 UZ in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-3 against the SP-590 UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d7fa/2d7faa438b5416bb259b61dd0b36326b0b3501ba" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-3 and SP-590 UZ is 56 and 72 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3512e/3512e6ab83f81fbcedd6aa7693edd183fe924910" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to picture the gap between sensor sizes only by going over a spec sheet. The picture underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-3 and SP-590 UZ.
As you can see, each of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-3 having a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus SP-590 UZ will offer you more detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The more aged E-3 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a7c3/3a7c3887af2de34e8e18d4f16839b53e465c0a5d" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a141b/a141b213a74e43387da44bb0e4d4ab63a56a34e1" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Olympus SP-590 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Olympus SP-590 UZ |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2008-02-20 | 2009-01-07 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 15s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 6.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 8.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890 gr (1.96 pounds) | 413 gr (0.91 pounds) |
Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $670 | $249 |