Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1838c/1838cdf26d1a273bfc0958872d51c3945bf812d1" alt="Olympus E-3 front Olympus E-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a542/5a54204eab4a88c3bca57f82f94873880adeaa4d" alt="Olympus SP-600 UZ front Olympus SP-600 UZ front"
69 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Released February 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-1
- Updated by Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Released February 2010
- Earlier Model is Olympus SP-590 UZ
- Replacement is Olympus SP-610UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Overview
Below is a thorough review of the Olympus E-3 and Olympus SP-600 UZ, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are offered by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the SP-600 UZ (12MP) is fairly well matched but the E-3 (Four Thirds) and SP-600 UZ (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-3 was brought out 23 months before the SP-600 UZ making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus SP-600 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-3 grades versus the SP-600 UZ with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-3 & Olympus SP-600 UZ. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Olympus SP-600 UZ
E-3 | SP-600 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Olympus E-3
SP-600 UZ | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2010 | ![]() | February 2008 | More recent by 23 months |
Display sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Olympus SP-600 UZ
E-3 | SP-600 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical display resolution |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-3 has got physical dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) and the Olympus SP-600 UZ has proportions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-3 and Olympus SP-600 UZ in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-3 against the SP-600 UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89a37/89a379466d050d909b4c39ced89ea3e154dcd654" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-3 and SP-600 UZ is 56 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9084/b90846de17d1726354f3edda538d685686c33f1b" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to envision the contrast between sensor measurements only by reading through specs. The graphic here might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-3 and SP-600 UZ.
All in all, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-3 because of its larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus SP-600 UZ will give greater detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images far more aggressively. The older E-3 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c887/8c887d841b5dfb0e5000cf6f8ac984a0f93c6c45" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/704bd/704bd3b5f3d179614bd18a60b8862ce963d87129" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Olympus SP-600 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-3 | Olympus SP-600 UZ |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2008-02-20 | 2010-02-02 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-420mm (15.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.4 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 1/2s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m | 3.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 890g (1.96 pounds) | 455g (1.00 pounds) |
Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $670 | $189 |