Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1838c/1838cdf26d1a273bfc0958872d51c3945bf812d1" alt="Olympus E-3 front Olympus E-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86e58/86e58dbdc1df53889f3e4aef4918a9ae36fe6ab0" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ front Olympus SP-800 UZ front"
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Introduced February 2008
- Old Model is Olympus E-1
- New Model is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Renewed by Olympus SP-810 UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-3 versus Olympus SP-800 UZ, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both manufactured by Olympus. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and SP-800 UZ (14MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-3 was launched 23 months prior to the SP-800 UZ which makes them a generation away from one another. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the E-3 grades vs the SP-800 UZ when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-3 & Olympus SP-800 UZ. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
E-3 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Olympus E-3
SP-800 UZ | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2010 | ![]() | February 2008 | More modern by 23 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Olympus SP-800 UZ
E-3 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
Touch screen | ![]() | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera often, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-3 features physical measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-800 UZ has dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-3 versus Olympus SP-800 UZ in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is a front view size comparison of the E-3 versus the SP-800 UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c82b/9c82beb9b2e90cc9b79be0b1869004bf5dc63495" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-3 and SP-800 UZ is 56 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d281/1d2810df3613b0176ec6258a6f9f8cd5eb1a1818" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading specifications. The image below may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-3 and SP-800 UZ.
Plainly, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-3 featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus SP-800 UZ will deliver more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-3 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/157ce/157ce770cca4fbfd27c4180695a4e63df5525281" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f8e1/3f8e120731487e1e12250c536ce3088303bd8087" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Olympus SP-800 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Olympus SP-800 UZ |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2008-02-20 | 2010-02-02 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 1000 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 12 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 3.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890g (1.96 lb) | 455g (1.00 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $670 | $270 |