Clicky

Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ

Portability
56
Imaging
45
Features
56
Overall
49
Olympus E-3 front
 
Olympus SP-800 UZ front
Portability
69
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs

Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
  • Introduced February 2008
  • Old Model is Olympus E-1
  • New Model is Olympus E-5
Olympus SP-800 UZ
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 1000)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
  • Revealed February 2010
  • Renewed by Olympus SP-810 UZ
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview

On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-3 versus Olympus SP-800 UZ, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both manufactured by Olympus. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and SP-800 UZ (14MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-3 was launched 23 months prior to the SP-800 UZ which makes them a generation away from one another. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera.

Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the E-3 grades vs the SP-800 UZ when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ

 E-3 SP-800 UZ 
Focus manually More accurate focusing
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Olympus E-3

 SP-800 UZ E-3 
RevealedFebruary 2010February 2008More modern by 23 months
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")

Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Olympus SP-800 UZ

 E-3 SP-800 UZ 
Screen resolution230k230kEqual screen resolution
Touch screen Missing Touch screen

Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison

When you are intending to carry around your camera often, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-3 features physical measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-800 UZ has dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-3 versus Olympus SP-800 UZ in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is a front view size comparison of the E-3 versus the SP-800 UZ.

Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-3 and SP-800 UZ is 56 and 69 respectively.

Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading specifications. The image below may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-3 and SP-800 UZ.

Plainly, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-3 featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus SP-800 UZ will deliver more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-3 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison

Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-3 Portrait photography features
Olympus SP-800 UZ Portrait photography features
57
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
28
good megapixels (14MP)
manual focus not available
no manual control
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Olympus E-3 Street photography advice
Olympus SP-800 UZ Street photography advice
70
screen can move to multiple angles
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
weather sealing
46
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-3 Sports photography information
Olympus SP-800 UZ Sports photography information
58
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
weather sealing
has phase detect autofocus
low fps (5.0 fps)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
47
incredible zoom range (28-840mm 30.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14MP)
has tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-3 Travel photography features
Olympus SP-800 UZ Travel photography features
55
weather sealing
built-in flash
screen is selfie friendly
doesn't have Timelapse mode
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
61
good megapixels (14MP)
flash built-in
fairly wide (28mm)
great zoom (840mm)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-3 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus SP-800 UZ as a Landscape photography camera
56
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
weather sealing
screen is small (2.5")
low resolution sensor (10MP)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
41
fairly wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14MP)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
no manual control
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-3 Vlogging information
Olympus SP-800 UZ Vlogging information
18
no video shooting
24
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external mic port
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-3 and Olympus SP-800 UZ
 Olympus E-3Olympus SP-800 UZ
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-3 Olympus SP-800 UZ
Category Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2008-02-20 2010-02-02
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Maximum boosted ISO - 1000
Minimum native ISO 100 64
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 11 143
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-840mm (30.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.8-5.6
Macro focus range - 1cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.58x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 12 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 5.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 13.00 m 3.10 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 890g (1.96 lb) 455g (1.00 lb)
Physical dimensions 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.6 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.5 not tested
DXO Low light score 571 not tested
Other
Battery model - Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (12 or 2 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $670 $270