Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SH-2
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1838c/1838cdf26d1a273bfc0958872d51c3945bf812d1" alt="Olympus E-3 front Olympus E-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac7d4/ac7d4b646d82f72e1235bc9a541f3ccc1d146b3c" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-2 front Olympus Stylus SH-2 front"
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Released February 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-1
- Newer Model is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced March 2015
- Superseded the Olympus SH-1
- Updated by Olympus SH-3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SH-2 Overview
Here is a in depth comparison of the Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SH-2, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are offered by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and SH-2 (16MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and SH-2 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-3 was announced 8 years before the SH-2 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus SH-2 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-3 grades against the SH-2 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SH-2 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-3 & Olympus Stylus SH-2. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Olympus SH-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Olympus SH-2
E-3 | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Olympus E-3
SH-2 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | March 2015 | ![]() | February 2008 | Fresher by 85 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Olympus SH-2
E-3 | SH-2 |
---|
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-3 comes with exterior measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") and a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) and the Olympus SH-2 has specifications of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SH-2 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the E-3 vs the SH-2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/002c1/002c11ac6f0d289af91dc7c48f094a518335fb92" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SH-2 size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SH-2 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-3 and SH-2 is 56 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a21f7/a21f75918016d90c25ab8d522815927e846d4a7a" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SH-2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SH-2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizing just by going through a spec sheet. The graphic below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-3 and SH-2.
Clearly, the 2 cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-3 having a bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Olympus SH-2 will show more detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The older E-3 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64131/64131afdbf46a7dc39270621d5274fd53e5ece73" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SH-2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SH-2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86394/8639410a697c56fc65de32402b8f3e460b9c6b91" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2008-02-20 | 2015-03-11 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | 11.5 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890g (1.96 lb) | 271g (0.60 lb) |
Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 380 images |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $670 | $399 |