Olympus E-3 vs Olympus Tough-3000
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Released February 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-1
- Successor is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Released January 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 3000
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-3 vs Olympus Tough-3000, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and both are designed by Olympus. The resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the Tough-3000 (12MP) is fairly close but the E-3 (Four Thirds) and Tough-3000 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-3 was introduced 22 months before the Tough-3000 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a full comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the E-3 scores versus the Tough-3000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-3 & Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Olympus Tough-3000
E-3 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus E-3
Tough-3000 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2010 | February 2008 | More recent by 22 months | |
Display dimension | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Olympus Tough-3000
E-3 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Same display resolution | |
Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-3 has got outer measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") and a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) and the Olympus Tough-3000 has dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-3 vs Olympus Tough-3000 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the E-3 and the Tough-3000.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-3 and Tough-3000 is 56 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to envision the gap in sensor measurements simply by researching specs. The visual below may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-3 and Tough-3000.
All in all, both of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-3 using its larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus Tough-3000 will provide you with extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images much more aggressively. The older E-3 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
Alternate name | - | mju Tough 3000 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Released | 2008-02-20 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus distance | - | 2cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890 grams (1.96 lbs) | 159 grams (0.35 lbs) |
Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $670 | $0 |