Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-860
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1838c/1838cdf26d1a273bfc0958872d51c3945bf812d1" alt="Olympus E-3 front Olympus E-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/042ab/042ab9bda5359b24c15525e105c8dbb85792e213" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Revealed February 2008
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-1
- Replacement is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced February 2015
- Later Model is Olympus TG-870
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
In this write-up, we are matching up the Olympus E-3 and Olympus TG-860, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and they are both manufactured by Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and TG-860 (16MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and TG-860 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-3 was released 8 years prior to the TG-860 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting in to a full comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-3 matches up against the TG-860 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-3 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Olympus TG-860
E-3 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Olympus E-3
TG-860 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2015 | ![]() | February 2008 | Newer by 84 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Olympus TG-860
E-3 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-3 enjoys exterior measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") having a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) and the Olympus TG-860 has dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
See the Olympus E-3 and Olympus TG-860 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the E-3 vs the TG-860.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37322/37322e74bf5c5699d0c609fdb1de498f2332348d" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-3 and TG-860 is 56 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/299c9/299c9b447584eabb2211a22b7e519912f0265f47" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions just by looking at a spec sheet. The picture underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-3 and TG-860.
Clearly, both cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-3 due to its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus TG-860 will give more detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged E-3 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b665/6b6659b22b422a04125f2d94af7f421665cf3e01" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ba22/4ba228689364801d3f3d7ea9f9eac95e02398050" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-3 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2008-02-20 | 2015-02-06 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per second | 7.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Yes |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 890 gr (1.96 lb) | 224 gr (0.49 lb) |
Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photos |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $670 | $279 |