Clicky

Olympus E-3 vs Olympus XZ-10

Portability
56
Imaging
44
Features
56
Overall
48
Olympus E-3 front
 
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front
Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
57
Overall
44

Olympus E-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs

Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
  • Released February 2008
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-1
  • Successor is Olympus E-5
Olympus XZ-10
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
  • 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
  • Revealed January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview

Below, we are analyzing the Olympus E-3 versus Olympus XZ-10, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both built by Olympus. The resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the XZ-10 (12MP) is fairly well matched but the E-3 (Four Thirds) and XZ-10 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-3 was released 6 years prior to the XZ-10 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera.

Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the E-3 grades versus the XZ-10 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Olympus XZ-10

 E-3 XZ-10 
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Olympus E-3

 XZ-10 E-3 
RevealedJanuary 2013February 2008Fresher by 60 months
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution920k230kClearer display (+690k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Olympus XZ-10

 E-3 XZ-10 
Focus manually More accurate focusing

Olympus E-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to carry your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-3 comes with physical dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-10 has sizing of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-3 versus Olympus XZ-10 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the E-3 against the XZ-10.

Olympus E-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-3 and XZ-10 is 56 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizing merely by looking at technical specs. The visual here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-3 and XZ-10.

As you can tell, both of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-3 because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus XZ-10 will resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older E-3 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-3 Portrait photography details
Olympus XZ-10 Portrait photography details
56
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
resolution not great (10MP)
45
has manual focus
comes with face detect autofocus
delivers RAW formats
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-3 Street photography factors
Olympus XZ-10 Street photography factors
69
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
environment proofing
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
more heavy than average (221g)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-3 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus XZ-10 as a Sports photography camera
57
high shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
environment proofing
comes with phase detect auto focus
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 fps)
resolution not great (10MP)
34
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking focus
max frames per second very slow (5.0 frames/s)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-3
Travel photography with Olympus XZ-10
55
environment proofing
flash built-in
selfie friendly screen
doesn't have Timelapse mode
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
60
flash built-in
quite wide (26mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
no Timelapse function
more heavy than average (221g)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-3 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus XZ-10 Landscape photography highlights
56
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
environment proofing
tiny screen (2.5 inches)
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
53
has manual focus
quite wide (26mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no Timelapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-3
Vlogging with Olympus XZ-10
18
no video recording
35
quite wide (26mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
touch screen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
display is not selfie friendly
no microphone socket
more heavy than average (221g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-3 and Olympus XZ-10
 Olympus E-3Olympus Stylus XZ-10
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-3 Olympus Stylus XZ-10
Category Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Released 2008-02-20 2013-01-30
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 3968 x 2976
Max native ISO 3200 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 11 35
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 26-130mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/1.8-2.7
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 230 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.58x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 5.0 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 13.00 m -
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 890 grams (1.96 pounds) 221 grams (0.49 pounds)
Dimensions 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.6 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.5 not tested
DXO Low light rating 571 not tested
Other
Battery life - 240 photos
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery ID - Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at release $670 $428