Olympus E-3 vs Olympus XZ-10
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1838c/1838cdf26d1a273bfc0958872d51c3945bf812d1" alt="Olympus E-3 front Olympus E-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82a12/82a1263e2fcea5ac4d6bef1198741cbea2097fd0" alt="Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front"
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Released February 2008
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-1
- Successor is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Revealed January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Olympus E-3 versus Olympus XZ-10, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both built by Olympus. The resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the XZ-10 (12MP) is fairly well matched but the E-3 (Four Thirds) and XZ-10 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-3 was released 6 years prior to the XZ-10 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the E-3 grades versus the XZ-10 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-3 and Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-3 Gallery and Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Olympus XZ-10
E-3 | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Olympus E-3
XZ-10 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | ![]() | February 2008 | Fresher by 60 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Olympus XZ-10
E-3 | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing |
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-3 comes with physical dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-10 has sizing of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-3 versus Olympus XZ-10 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the E-3 against the XZ-10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c65a/8c65a7734153d3c3b472b49137251b76ef144971" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-3 and XZ-10 is 56 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ea4c/9ea4c5818efc775e0a8739e41c702b4050613900" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizing merely by looking at technical specs. The visual here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-3 and XZ-10.
As you can tell, both of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-3 because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus XZ-10 will resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older E-3 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a11a/1a11ad76a05252af1db0187c16b37b272bfae536" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 sensor size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7b47/a7b47fe56f31ca130e5c77bea594286a8a21d9b7" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-3 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2008-02-20 | 2013-01-30 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/1.8-2.7 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 890 grams (1.96 pounds) | 221 grams (0.49 pounds) |
Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 photos |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $670 | $428 |