Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-810
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1838c/1838cdf26d1a273bfc0958872d51c3945bf812d1" alt="Olympus E-3 front Olympus E-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33564/33564fa180a03f0ad37d4e2877201fb0d473cbdb" alt="Olympus TG-810 front Olympus TG-810 front"
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-810 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Announced February 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
- Released August 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-810 Overview
Below is a in-depth assessment of the Olympus E-3 and Olympus TG-810, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Waterproof and both are designed by Olympus. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and TG-810 (14MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and TG-810 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-3 was brought out 4 years earlier than the TG-810 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-810 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the E-3 grades versus the TG-810 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-810 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-3 and Olympus TG-810. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-3 Gallery and Olympus TG-810 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Olympus TG-810
E-3 | TG-810 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-810 over the Olympus E-3
TG-810 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2011 | ![]() | February 2008 | More recent by 42 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Olympus TG-810
E-3 | TG-810 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-810 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-3 enjoys physical dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") along with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) while the Olympus TG-810 has sizing of 100mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-3 and Olympus TG-810 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the E-3 against the TG-810.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84dcf/84dcfba470df7786bf57067a9cd90bb2dd43e76d" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-810 size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-810 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-3 and TG-810 is 56 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c532/8c532ca78a6b2c7a34387ff226aa639a0ea6829d" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-810 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-810 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-810 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to see the gap in sensor measurements just by going through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-3 and TG-810.
As you can see, the two cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-3 featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus TG-810 will produce more detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The older E-3 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/311e9/311e9627a0458b0ca217b298035874f545ea2051" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-810 sensor size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-810 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffa7c/ffa7cf5b1ede98174dd8f89f9d9e60ece054d234" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-810 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Olympus TG-810 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Olympus TG-810 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Announced | 2008-02-20 | 2011-08-16 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 4.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890 gr (1.96 lbs) | 215 gr (0.47 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail price | $670 | $428 |