Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
91 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Introduced February 2008
- Old Model is Olympus E-1
- Later Model is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Announced January 2013
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
The following is a extensive assessment of the Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Waterproof and both are produced by Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and TG-830 iHS (16MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-3 was announced 5 years earlier than the TG-830 iHS which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the E-3 scores against the TG-830 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-3 and Olympus TG-830 iHS. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-3 Gallery and Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
E-3 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Olympus E-3
TG-830 iHS | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | February 2008 | Newer by 59 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Olympus TG-830 iHS
E-3 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-3 has external dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) while the Olympus TG-830 iHS has sizing of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-3 and the TG-830 iHS.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-3 and TG-830 iHS is 56 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions simply by going through a spec sheet. The picture underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-3 and TG-830 iHS.
As you can see, the two cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-3 using its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus TG-830 iHS will provide more detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged E-3 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2008-02-20 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890 grams (1.96 lb) | 214 grams (0.47 lb) |
Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $670 | $0 |