Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-3
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Revealed February 2008
- Old Model is Olympus E-1
- Replacement is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed March 2014
- Newer Model is Olympus TG-4
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Olympus E-3 and Olympus TG-3, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are created by Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and TG-3 (16MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and TG-3 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-3 was brought out 7 years earlier than the TG-3 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the E-3 matches up against the TG-3 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-3 and Olympus Tough TG-3. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-3 Gallery and Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Olympus TG-3
E-3 | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Olympus E-3
TG-3 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | March 2014 | February 2008 | Fresher by 74 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Olympus TG-3
E-3 | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-3 provides external measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") having a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) while the Olympus TG-3 has measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-3 and Olympus TG-3 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the E-3 and the TG-3.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-3 and TG-3 is 56 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizing only by reading specifications. The visual below should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-3 and TG-3.
To sum up, the two cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-3 because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus TG-3 will offer you more detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The older E-3 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2008-02-20 | 2014-03-31 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | - | TFT-LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890g (1.96 lbs) | 247g (0.54 lbs) |
Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $670 | $350 |