Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VR-320
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1838c/1838cdf26d1a273bfc0958872d51c3945bf812d1" alt="Olympus E-3 front Olympus E-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Launched February 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-1
- Renewed by Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Successor is Olympus VR-330
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Here is a extensive review of the Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VR-320, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are sold by Olympus. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and VR-320 (14MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and VR-320 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-3 was introduced 4 years prior to the VR-320 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the E-3 matches up vs the VR-320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-3 and Olympus VR-320. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-3 Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Olympus VR-320
E-3 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus E-3
VR-320 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2011 | ![]() | February 2008 | Fresher by 41 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Olympus VR-320
E-3 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same display resolution |
Touch display | ![]() | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera often, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-3 has outer measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VR-320 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the E-3 versus the VR-320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e61a/7e61ac33de006fa02ab52e08f45d6b60b42a9b97" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-3 and VR-320 is 56 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a29b4/a29b4073ca83c5ef35bea2c32d7ed780adb3ab82" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizing merely by going through technical specs. The photograph underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-3 and VR-320.
As you have seen, both cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-3 with its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus VR-320 will provide more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos much more aggressively. The older E-3 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19b63/19b6353d486d42998b578c242834adf1144b3572" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64524/6452441ad4a6d17dd00eda356f98fb3d4a0c9da6" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-3 | Olympus VR-320 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2008-02-20 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 890 gr (1.96 lbs) | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) |
Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $670 | $179 |