Olympus E-3 vs Olympus XZ-1
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Launched February 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-1
- Replacement is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Revealed January 2011
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Olympus E-3 vs Olympus XZ-1, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both produced by Olympus. The resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the XZ-1 (10MP) is relatively well matched but the E-3 (Four Thirds) and XZ-1 (1/1.63") use totally different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-3 was launched 3 years before the XZ-1 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the E-3 matches up against the XZ-1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-3 & Olympus XZ-1. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Olympus XZ-1
E-3 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus E-3
XZ-1 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2011 | February 2008 | Fresher by 35 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 614k | 230k | Crisper screen (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Olympus XZ-1
E-3 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-3 provides outside dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-1 has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-3 vs Olympus XZ-1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the E-3 compared to the XZ-1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-3 and XZ-1 is 56 and 88 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to envision the gap between sensor sizing only by looking at a spec sheet. The visual here will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-3 and XZ-1.
Clearly, each of the cameras have got the exact same megapixels albeit not the same sensor sizing. The E-3 has got the bigger sensor which is going to make obtaining bokeh easier. The older E-3 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Olympus XZ-1 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2008-02-20 | 2011-01-26 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | TruePic V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.63" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 44.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3664 x 2752 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890g (1.96 pounds) | 275g (0.61 pounds) |
Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | 34 |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | 18.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | 10.4 |
DXO Low light score | 571 | 117 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 pictures |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $670 | $567 |