Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH1
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Released February 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-1
- Successor is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 163g - 98 x 55 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FS10
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH1 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH1, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the FH1 (12MP) is pretty close but the E-3 (Four Thirds) and FH1 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-3 was released 22 months earlier than the FH1 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FH1 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-3 scores versus the FH1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-3 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Panasonic FH1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Panasonic FH1
| E-3 | FH1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH1 over the Olympus E-3
| FH1 | E-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2010 |  | February 2008 | More modern by 22 months |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Panasonic FH1
| E-3 | FH1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH1 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-3 enjoys external measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") having a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FH1 has measurements of 98mm x 55mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 163 grams (0.36 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the E-3 vs the FH1.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-3 and FH1 is 56 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizes only by researching specs. The pic here should give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-3 and FH1.
All in all, both the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-3 due to its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Panasonic FH1 will provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged E-3 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH1 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH1 Specifications
| Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 |
| Alternate name | - | Lumix DMC-FS10 |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2008-02-20 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-6.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 6.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 13.00 m | 6.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 890 gr (1.96 pounds) | 163 gr (0.36 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 98 x 55 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $670 | $150 |