Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH2
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1838c/1838cdf26d1a273bfc0958872d51c3945bf812d1" alt="Olympus E-3 front Olympus E-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58d3b/58d3bced54bef37acbf33e0cc1a92af65eb0c1e4" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Revealed February 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-1
- Updated by Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F3.1-6.5) lens
- 121g - 94 x 54 x 19mm
- Released January 2011
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FS16
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH2 Overview
In this article, we will be comparing the Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH2, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and FH2 (14MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and FH2 (1/2.3") use different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-3 was announced 3 years before the FH2 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FH2 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a in depth comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the E-3 grades against the FH2 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH2 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-3 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Panasonic FH2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Panasonic FH2
E-3 | FH2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH2 over the Olympus E-3
FH2 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2011 | ![]() | February 2008 | More recent by 35 months |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Panasonic FH2
E-3 | FH2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH2 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-3 has physical dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) and the Panasonic FH2 has proportions of 94mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
See the Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH2 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the E-3 versus the FH2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bef1f/bef1fe0f6566838b1e97192b8df4a30e601453d1" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH2 size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH2 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-3 and FH2 is 56 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97ad8/97ad83f1148dbe2b052344ba3a484120d0281473" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH2 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to picture the difference in sensor measurements purely by researching specs. The visual here will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-3 and FH2.
All in all, both the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-3 with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Panasonic FH2 will provide you with extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The older E-3 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d42b8/d42b8a8560fc4fc2a0d5bb0ba08b6434de59d2f5" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/386e5/386e55d873bcfe330dd29417cf100c6581c2284f" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH2 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FS16 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2008-02-20 | 2011-01-05 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | Venus Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.1-6.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 3.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890 gr (1.96 lbs) | 121 gr (0.27 lbs) |
Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 94 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 270 shots |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail price | $670 | $149 |