Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH5
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1838c/1838cdf26d1a273bfc0958872d51c3945bf812d1" alt="Olympus E-3 front Olympus E-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4947f/4947fb87fbec47ca46c132a07069d33ec1864a0c" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH5 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH5 front"
96 Imaging
38 Features
31 Overall
35
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Announced February 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-1
- Updated by Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F3.1-6.5) lens
- 121g - 94 x 54 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FS18
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH5 Overview
Below, we are matching up the Olympus E-3 versus Panasonic FH5, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and FH5 (16MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and FH5 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-3 was launched 3 years before the FH5 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FH5 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-3 scores against the FH5 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH5 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-3 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH5. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Panasonic FH5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Panasonic FH5
E-3 | FH5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH5 over the Olympus E-3
FH5 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2011 | ![]() | February 2008 | More modern by 35 months |
Display dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Panasonic FH5
E-3 | FH5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same display resolution |
Touch display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH5 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you should consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-3 has got outer measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") having a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) and the Panasonic FH5 has specifications of 94mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-3 versus Panasonic FH5 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the E-3 vs the FH5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dcf17/dcf177fba6e214b703f44a0b3bb3d186cbd47fc1" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH5 size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH5 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-3 and FH5 is 56 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/147cb/147cb0ae62e995098f9a937bfd839ae575fcacb8" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH5 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH5 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH5 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to see the contrast in sensor sizes only by researching technical specs. The picture here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-3 and FH5.
As you can tell, each of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-3 featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic FH5 will provide you with greater detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-3 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df1dc/df1dc6b4f742486701bb08e1e34667ae2b83d9cf" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH5 sensor size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH5 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/145e2/145e2e079bf528975ba14f6f6c4e0b3d69c31210" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FH5 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH5 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FS18 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2008-02-20 | 2011-01-05 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Venus Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.1-6.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | 4.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 3.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890 grams (1.96 lbs) | 121 grams (0.27 lbs) |
Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 94 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $670 | $169 |