Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FS42
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1838c/1838cdf26d1a273bfc0958872d51c3945bf812d1" alt="Olympus E-3 front Olympus E-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9979/f9979d6158b07faa33963a04f4938253f5f9ce99" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front"
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Announced February 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-1
- Renewed by Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Push to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Released April 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Olympus E-3 versus Panasonic FS42, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the FS42 (10MP) is pretty well matched but the E-3 (Four Thirds) and FS42 (1/2.5") offer different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-3 was released 14 months earlier than the FS42 which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-3 matches up vs the FS42 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-3 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-3 Gallery and Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Panasonic FS42
E-3 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus E-3
FS42 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2009 | ![]() | February 2008 | More modern by 14 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Panasonic FS42
E-3 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 2.5" | ![]() | 2.5" | Same screen measurements |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
Touch screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-3 has got outside dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") having a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) while the Panasonic FS42 has proportions of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-3 versus Panasonic FS42 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-3 vs the FS42.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e47cc/e47cc71206934daadd6504d3da558bf35b0a8fe2" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-3 and FS42 is 56 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/740d5/740d58482b0523ebe679e6612453b46ce5783030" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizes merely by looking at technical specs. The image underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-3 and FS42.
As you can tell, the two cameras come with the identical megapixel count albeit different sensor sizes. The E-3 includes the bigger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallow DOF less difficult. The more aged E-3 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d1d9/8d1d908a9e21782caf47e060e68db4221d46e22c" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28beb/28beb63bda4b193753ec22a54f46c3bf9639ba0f" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2008-02-20 | 2009-04-17 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.5" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1000 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5" | 2.5" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 6.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890 gr (1.96 lb) | 132 gr (0.29 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $670 | $580 |