Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FX580
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1838c/1838cdf26d1a273bfc0958872d51c3945bf812d1" alt="Olympus E-3 front Olympus E-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b3f2/9b3f2d6a50d2689c7f63c3c89a882f0e770aa80f" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580 front"
95 Imaging
34 Features
29 Overall
32
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FX580 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Introduced February 2008
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 167g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FX550
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FX580 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FX580, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the FX580 (12MP) is fairly comparable but the E-3 (Four Thirds) and FX580 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-3 was manufactured 11 months earlier than the FX580 and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FX580 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-3 scores against the FX580 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FX580 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-3 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Panasonic FX580 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Panasonic FX580
E-3 | FX580 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX580 over the Olympus E-3
FX580 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2009 | ![]() | February 2008 | Fresher by 11 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Panasonic FX580
E-3 | FX580 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FX580 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-3 provides physical measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) and the Panasonic FX580 has specifications of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FX580 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at the time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-3 vs the FX580.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92513/925130f4195c5b907561408d8e52aaa0a28a3f20" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FX580 size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FX580 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-3 and FX580 is 56 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da834/da834b32ae866d019599be7cae4a3632e693ae42" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FX580 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FX580 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FX580 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to envision the difference in sensor sizing purely by seeing a spec sheet. The visual underneath should provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-3 and FX580.
As you can see, both cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-3 due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Panasonic FX580 will produce more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older E-3 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c3be/5c3be40308e71e54f6e682260897ee27e078146e" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FX580 sensor size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FX580 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FX580 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8bb91/8bb9192ed04bf1a3786a5e9382d4774b7339ebcf" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FX580 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FX580 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FX580 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-FX550 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2008-02-20 | 2009-01-27 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m | 6.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 890g (1.96 lb) | 167g (0.37 lb) |
Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $670 | $499 |