Clicky

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ200

Portability
56
Imaging
45
Features
56
Overall
49
Olympus E-3 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 front
Portability
65
Imaging
36
Features
64
Overall
47

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs

Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
  • Announced February 2008
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-1
  • Replacement is Olympus E-5
Panasonic FZ200
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
  • 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
  • Announced July 2012
  • Replaced the Panasonic FZ100
  • Newer Model is Panasonic FZ300
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview

Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ200, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the FZ200 (12MP) is relatively well matched but the E-3 (Four Thirds) and FZ200 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-3 was announced 5 years before the FZ200 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before we go into a full comparison, here is a short summation of how the E-3 scores vs the FZ200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Panasonic FZ200

 E-3 FZ200 

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus E-3

 FZ200 E-3 
AnnouncedJuly 2012February 2008Fresher by 53 months
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Panasonic FZ200

 E-3 FZ200 
Manually focus Very precise focus
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFully ArticulatedFully Articulated screen
Selfie screen Both are selfie friendly
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to carry your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-3 has got physical measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ200 has proportions of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") with a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the E-3 and the FZ200.

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-3 and FZ200 is 56 and 65 respectively.

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reading through specifications. The graphic here may give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-3 and FZ200.

Plainly, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-3 having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Panasonic FZ200 will resolve greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The older E-3 is going to be behind in sensor tech.

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-3 as a Portrait photography camera
Panasonic FZ200 as a Portrait photography camera
57
you can focus manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
megapixel count low (10MP)
48
you can focus manually
great flash sync speed (1/4,000s)
includes face detection focus
delivers RAW files
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-3 Street photography factors
Panasonic FZ200 Street photography factors
70
screen articulates fully
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
weather proof
57
screen articulates fully
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
small sensor size (1/2.3")
more heavy than competition (588 grams)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-3
Sports photography with Panasonic FZ200
58
high shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
weather proof
has phase detect AF
max fps very slow (5.0 frames per second)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
46
incredible zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes tracking autofocus
better than average battery life (540 CIPA)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-3 Travel photography details
Panasonic FZ200 Travel photography details
55
weather proof
built-in flash
selfie friendly screen
does not have Timelapse recording
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
55
better than average battery life (540 shots)
has built in flash
selfie friendly display
rather wide (25mm)
very long zoom (600mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (588g)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-3
Landscape photography with Panasonic FZ200
56
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
weather proof
screen is small (2.5 inches)
megapixel count low (10MP)
does not have Timelapse recording
48
you can focus manually
rather wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
better than average battery life (540 shots)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-3
Vlogging with Panasonic FZ200
18
lack of video recording
63
rather wide (25mm)
selfie friendly display
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
includes external microphone port
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
more heavy than competition (588g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-3 and Panasonic FZ200
 Olympus E-3Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-3 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2008-02-20 2012-07-18
Body design Mid-size SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III Venus Engine VII FHD
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Highest enhanced ISO - 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 11 23
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.8
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fully Articulated Fully Articulated
Screen diagonal 2.5" 3"
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech - Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,312 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage 100% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.58x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 60s
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 5.0 frames/s 12.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 13.00 m 13.50 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250s 1/4000s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 890 grams (1.96 pounds) 588 grams (1.30 pounds)
Physical dimensions 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 56 37
DXO Color Depth score 21.6 19.1
DXO Dynamic range score 10.5 10.8
DXO Low light score 571 114
Other
Battery life - 540 photos
Battery form - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $670 $499