Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ200
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48


65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Announced February 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-1
- Replacement is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Announced July 2012
- Replaced the Panasonic FZ100
- Newer Model is Panasonic FZ300

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ200, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the FZ200 (12MP) is relatively well matched but the E-3 (Four Thirds) and FZ200 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.

The E-3 was announced 5 years before the FZ200 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go into a full comparison, here is a short summation of how the E-3 scores vs the FZ200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-3 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-3 Gallery and Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Panasonic FZ200
E-3 | FZ200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus E-3
FZ200 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2012 | ![]() | February 2008 | Fresher by 53 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Panasonic FZ200
E-3 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Both are selfie friendly | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch screen |
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-3 has got physical measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ200 has proportions of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") with a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the E-3 and the FZ200.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-3 and FZ200 is 56 and 65 respectively.

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reading through specifications. The graphic here may give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-3 and FZ200.
Plainly, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-3 having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Panasonic FZ200 will resolve greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The older E-3 is going to be behind in sensor tech.

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2008-02-20 | 2012-07-18 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Venus Engine VII FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,312 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 13.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250s | 1/4000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890 grams (1.96 pounds) | 588 grams (1.30 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | 37 |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | 19.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | 10.8 |
DXO Low light score | 571 | 114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 540 photos |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $670 | $499 |