Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ2500
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
53 Imaging
53 Features
81 Overall
64
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Revealed February 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-1
- Newer Model is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Released September 2016
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Replaced the Panasonic FZ1000
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
The following is a in-depth overview of the Olympus E-3 versus Panasonic FZ2500, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and FZ2500 (20MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and FZ2500 (1") provide totally different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-3 was unveiled 9 years before the FZ2500 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the E-3 matches up versus the FZ2500 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-3 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Panasonic FZ2500
E-3 | FZ2500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus E-3
FZ2500 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | February 2008 | Newer by 104 months | |
Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Crisper display (+810k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Panasonic FZ2500
E-3 | FZ2500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display | |
Selfie screen | Both good for selfies |
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-3 comes with outside measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") having a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ2500 has proportions of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") with a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
See the Olympus E-3 versus Panasonic FZ2500 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the E-3 and the FZ2500.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-3 and FZ2500 is 56 and 53 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by checking technical specs. The image below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-3 and FZ2500.
As you have seen, both the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-3 with its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Panasonic FZ2500 will give you extra detail having an extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-3 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2008-02-20 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | None | 4096x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890 grams (1.96 lb) | 915 grams (2.02 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | 571 | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | DMW-BLC12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $670 | $998 |