Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic GF1
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
85 Imaging
46 Features
47 Overall
46
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic GF1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Announced February 2008
- Old Model is Olympus E-1
- Renewed by Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 385g - 119 x 71 x 36mm
- Revealed October 2009
- Later Model is Panasonic GF2
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic GF1 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Olympus E-3 versus Panasonic GF1, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the GF1 (12MP) is pretty close and both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-3 was released 20 months earlier than the GF1 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic GF1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-3 grades versus the GF1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic GF1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-3 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Panasonic GF1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Panasonic GF1
| E-3 | GF1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic GF1 over the Olympus E-3
| GF1 | E-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | October 2009 | February 2008 | More recent by 20 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Panasonic GF1
| E-3 | GF1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic GF1 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-3 has got external dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) while the Panasonic GF1 has measurements of 119mm x 71mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4") with a weight of 385 grams (0.85 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-3 versus Panasonic GF1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-3 and the GF1.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-3 and GF1 is 56 and 85 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic GF1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to imagine the gap in sensor measurements purely by researching specifications. The graphic here will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-3 and GF1.
Plainly, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Panasonic GF1 to provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots way more aggressively. The older E-3 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic GF1 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic GF1 Specifications
| Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2008-02-20 | 2009-10-14 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine HD |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 13.00 m | 6.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | AVCHD Lite |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 890g (1.96 lbs) | 385g (0.85 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 119 x 71 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 56 | 54 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | 21.2 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | 10.3 |
| DXO Low light score | 571 | 513 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 380 shots |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/MMC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $670 | $400 |