Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic S3
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
96 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic S3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Introduced February 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-1
- Updated by Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 117g - 99 x 59 x 21mm
- Revealed January 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic S3 Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-3 and Panasonic S3, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and S3 (14MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and S3 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-3 was introduced 3 years before the S3 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic S3 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the E-3 scores vs the S3 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic S3 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-3 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-S3. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Panasonic S3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Panasonic S3
| E-3 | S3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic S3 over the Olympus E-3
| S3 | E-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2011 | February 2008 | More modern by 35 months | |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Panasonic S3
| E-3 | S3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal screen resolution | |
| Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic S3 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-3 provides outer measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) and the Panasonic S3 has specifications of 99mm x 59mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-3 and Panasonic S3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the E-3 versus the S3.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-3 and S3 is 56 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic S3 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizes merely by looking through a spec sheet. The pic underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-3 and S3.
Clearly, both of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-3 having a bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Panasonic S3 will provide you with greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged E-3 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic S3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic S3 Specifications
| Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-S3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-S3 |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2008-02-20 | 2011-01-05 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 13.00 m | 3.30 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 890 gr (1.96 pounds) | 117 gr (0.26 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 99 x 59 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 250 photos |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $670 | $110 |