Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic SZ3
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1838c/1838cdf26d1a273bfc0958872d51c3945bf812d1" alt="Olympus E-3 front Olympus E-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85a33/85a33a9c422aa8408eb0f74a734c2897c9eab6d2" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ3 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ3 front"
96 Imaging
39 Features
29 Overall
35
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic SZ3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Revealed February 2008
- Previous Model is Olympus E-1
- New Model is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 126g - 95 x 56 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic SZ3 Overview
Here is a extended comparison of the Olympus E-3 versus Panasonic SZ3, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and SZ3 (16MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and SZ3 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-3 was announced 5 years prior to the SZ3 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic SZ3 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-3 matches up against the SZ3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic SZ3 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-3 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ3. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-3 Gallery and Panasonic SZ3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Panasonic SZ3
E-3 | SZ3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic SZ3 over the Olympus E-3
SZ3 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | ![]() | February 2008 | Fresher by 59 months |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Panasonic SZ3
E-3 | SZ3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same display resolution |
Touch display | ![]() | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic SZ3 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-3 offers exterior dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) whilst the Panasonic SZ3 has proportions of 95mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-3 versus Panasonic SZ3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-3 against the SZ3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80ff1/80ff103ea57cf3cea05fa5766e0004bc7ebd3479" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic SZ3 size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic SZ3 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-3 and SZ3 is 56 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61fab/61fab15598c1f67bd5ecbee0a3b74faf88416c64" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic SZ3 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic SZ3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic SZ3 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizing purely by reviewing specifications. The graphic underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-3 and SZ3.
To sum up, both cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-3 using its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Panasonic SZ3 will deliver extra detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The older E-3 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2152d/2152d99361e93c3c95ef94b75e954f3ebfbc464c" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic SZ3 sensor size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic SZ3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic SZ3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/966bd/966bdeaca5e51144ca759214b2874c33cee7ade4" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic SZ3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic SZ3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic SZ3 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ3 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2008-02-20 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.1-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 4.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890g (1.96 lb) | 126g (0.28 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 95 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 250 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $670 | $150 |