Clicky

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZR3

Portability
56
Imaging
44
Features
56
Overall
48
Olympus E-3 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 front
Portability
94
Imaging
36
Features
26
Overall
32

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZR3 Key Specs

Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
  • Released February 2008
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-1
  • New Model is Olympus E-5
Panasonic ZR3
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 159g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
  • Launched January 2010
  • Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-ZX3
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZR3 Overview

Here, we are comparing the Olympus E-3 versus Panasonic ZR3, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and ZR3 (14MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and ZR3 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-3 was revealed 23 months earlier than the ZR3 making them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZR3 being a Compact camera.

Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the E-3 grades against the ZR3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Panasonic ZR3

 E-3 ZR3 
Manually focus Dial accurate focus
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR3 over the Olympus E-3

 ZR3 E-3 
LaunchedJanuary 2010February 2008Newer by 23 months
Display size2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")

Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Panasonic ZR3

 E-3 ZR3 
Display resolution230k230kExact same display resolution
Touch display Absent Touch display

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZR3 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to travel with your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-3 has outside measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") and a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) while the Panasonic ZR3 has specifications of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-3 versus Panasonic ZR3 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that moment. Below is a front view size comparison of the E-3 versus the ZR3.

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZR3 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-3 and ZR3 is 56 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZR3 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZR3 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's tough to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by looking at specifications. The pic below might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-3 and ZR3.

Plainly, both of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-3 with its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh simpler and the Panasonic ZR3 will give you greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-3 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZR3 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZR3 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZR3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-3 Portrait photography factors
Panasonic ZR3 Portrait photography factors
56
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
low megapixels (10MP)
28
decent MP (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
no manual control
no external flash support
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-3 Street photography information
Panasonic ZR3 Street photography information
69
screen articulates
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
environment proof
56
image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-3
Sports photography with Panasonic ZR3
57
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000s)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
environment proof
sensor has phase detect autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
low megapixels (10MP)
36
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,300s)
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-3 as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic ZR3 as a Travel photography camera
55
environment proof
built-in flash
screen is selfie friendly
lack of Timelapse recording
low megapixels (10MP)
64
decent MP (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (25mm)
no Timelapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.3)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-3
Landscape photography with Panasonic ZR3
56
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
environment proof
tiny screen (2.5 inches)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
lack of Timelapse recording
37
reasonably wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14MP)
manual focus not available
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
screen is small (2.7")
no manual control
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
no Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-3 Vlogging info
Panasonic ZR3 Vlogging info
18
can't shoot video
29
reasonably wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
screen is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external microphone socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZR3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-3 and Panasonic ZR3
 Olympus E-3Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3
General Information
Brand Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus E-3 Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3
Also called as - Lumix DMC-ZX3
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Released 2008-02-20 2010-01-26
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III Venus Engine HD II
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 4320 x 3240
Max native ISO 3200 6400
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 11 11
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-200mm (8.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.3-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 3cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.58x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/1300 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 5.0 frames per sec 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 13.00 m 5.30 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - AVCHD Lite
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 890 grams (1.96 pounds) 159 grams (0.35 pounds)
Physical dimensions 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.6 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.5 not tested
DXO Low light rating 571 not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $670 $280