Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung CL80
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
95 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung CL80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Superseded the Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Additionally Known as ST5500
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung CL80 Overview
Here is a thorough review of the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung CL80, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and CL80 (14MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and CL80 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe GR Digital IV was launched 21 months later than the CL80 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL80 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the GR Digital IV matches up against the CL80 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung CL80 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR Digital IV & Samsung CL80. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery & Samsung CL80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Samsung CL80
GR Digital IV | CL80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2011 | January 2010 | Fresher by 21 months | |
Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 1230k | 230k | Clearer screen (+1000k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL80 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
CL80 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3.7" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.7") | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung CL80
GR Digital IV | CL80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung CL80 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR Digital IV has external dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Samsung CL80 has measurements of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung CL80 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the GR Digital IV and the CL80.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital IV and CL80 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung CL80 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizing purely by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the GR Digital IV and CL80.
Clearly, the two cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The GR Digital IV because of its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Samsung CL80 will give extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The fresher GR Digital IV is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung CL80 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung CL80 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung CL80 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung CL80 |
Also referred to as | - | ST5500 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2011-09-15 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4334 x 3256 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 4800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) | 160 grams (0.35 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 images | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB65 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $599 | $400 |