Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS1
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
91 Imaging
32 Features
25 Overall
29
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Released February 2008
- Previous Model is Olympus E-1
- New Model is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 229g - 103 x 60 x 33mm
- Released May 2009
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ6
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS1 Overview
Following is a extended review of the Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS1, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the ZS1 (10MP) is very close but the E-3 (Four Thirds) and ZS1 (1/2.5") possess totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-3 was revealed 14 months before the ZS1 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS1 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-3 scores against the ZS1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-3 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Panasonic ZS1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Panasonic ZS1
| E-3 | ZS1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS1 over the Olympus E-3
| ZS1 | E-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2009 | February 2008 | More modern by 14 months | |
| Display dimension | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Panasonic ZS1
| E-3 | ZS1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Same display resolution | |
| Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-3 enjoys physical measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS1 has sizing of 103mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 229 grams (0.50 lbs).
See the Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at that moment. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the E-3 vs the ZS1.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-3 and ZS1 is 56 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes merely by looking through specs. The picture here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-3 and ZS1.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have got the exact same megapixel count but not the same sensor sizes. The E-3 includes the larger sensor which will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult. The more aged E-3 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS1 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS1 Specifications
| Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 |
| Alternate name | - | Lumix DMC-TZ6 |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2008-02-20 | 2009-05-14 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 13.00 m | 5.30 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 640x480 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 890g (1.96 lbs) | 229g (0.50 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 103 x 60 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $670 | $0 |