Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS10
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1838c/1838cdf26d1a273bfc0958872d51c3945bf812d1" alt="Olympus E-3 front Olympus E-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/807b0/807b089857a251fd5fc82ebc6238512c0fcc02c9" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 front"
91 Imaging
37 Features
46 Overall
40
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Released February 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-1
- Updated by Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 219g - 105 x 58 x 33mm
- Released January 2011
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ20 / Lumix DMC-TZ22
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS10 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus E-3 and Panasonic ZS10, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and ZS10 (14MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and ZS10 (1/2.3") offer different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-3 was released 3 years earlier than the ZS10 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS10 being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a quick summation of how the E-3 matches up against the ZS10 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS10 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-3 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Panasonic ZS10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Panasonic ZS10
E-3 | ZS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS10 over the Olympus E-3
ZS10 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2011 | ![]() | February 2008 | More recent by 35 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Panasonic ZS10
E-3 | ZS10 |
---|
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS10 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-3 has got physical measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") along with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS10 has dimensions of 105mm x 58mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 219 grams (0.48 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-3 and Panasonic ZS10 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-3 compared to the ZS10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e11e4/e11e4cae017c82aac51d012234de441e108dbd7b" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS10 size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS10 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-3 and ZS10 is 56 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1db4a/1db4a96269ccc28c39ead85fd7373258ecb6008c" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS10 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS10 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS10 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to picture the contrast between sensor measurements simply by going over technical specs. The photograph below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-3 and ZS10.
As you can tell, each of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-3 due to its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic ZS10 will offer more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older E-3 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b36af/b36af078eb8e26054204ae1c4c405587f528019f" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS10 sensor size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS10 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc0af/cc0af514b582142e43a07a421b045b5b87cdf525" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS10 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ20 / Lumix DMC-TZ22 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2008-02-20 | 2011-01-25 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890 grams (1.96 lbs) | 219 grams (0.48 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 105 x 58 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 shots |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $670 | $350 |