Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS25
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
93 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Launched February 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-1
- Successor is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 28mm
- Released January 2013
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-TZ35
- Succeeded the Panasonic ZS20
- New Model is Panasonic ZS30
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS25 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus E-3 and Panasonic ZS25, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and ZS25 (16MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and ZS25 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-3 was manufactured 5 years prior to the ZS25 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS25 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-3 matches up vs the ZS25 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS25 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-3 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Panasonic ZS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Panasonic ZS25
E-3 | ZS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS25 over the Olympus E-3
ZS25 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | February 2008 | Newer by 59 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Panasonic ZS25
E-3 | ZS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS25 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-3 has physical measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") and a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS25 has specifications of 105mm x 59mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-3 and Panasonic ZS25 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-3 vs the ZS25.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-3 and ZS25 is 56 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS25 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by looking through specs. The pic below may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-3 and ZS25.
All in all, both the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-3 because of its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic ZS25 will provide you with extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-3 will be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS25 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS25 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 |
Alternative name | - | Lumix DMC-TZ35 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2008-02-20 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 15s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1200s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 6.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890 grams (1.96 pounds) | 193 grams (0.43 pounds) |
Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 105 x 59 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $670 | $300 |