Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS35
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1838c/1838cdf26d1a273bfc0958872d51c3945bf812d1" alt="Olympus E-3 front Olympus E-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79b96/79b9603f77f7c51f1ac0c53523d43d29d519fd6f" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 front"
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Launched February 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-1
- Replacement is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Launched January 2014
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Previous Model is Panasonic ZS30
- New Model is Panasonic ZS40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
The following is a comprehensive review of the Olympus E-3 versus Panasonic ZS35, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and ZS35 (16MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and ZS35 (1/2.3") boast different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-3 was released 6 years earlier than the ZS35 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS35 being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-3 grades against the ZS35 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-3 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-3 Gallery and Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Panasonic ZS35
E-3 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Olympus E-3
ZS35 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | ![]() | February 2008 | Newer by 71 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Panasonic ZS35
E-3 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-3 enjoys exterior dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") having a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS35 has specifications of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-3 versus Panasonic ZS35 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-3 versus the ZS35.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e9f9/1e9f901803bca6b23f30b3a9f9de6ab33e583466" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS35 size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS35 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-3 and ZS35 is 56 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36cd9/36cd9da77b8771bb9f7539d14eb4821352f739f6" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS35 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS35 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading through a spec sheet. The pic here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-3 and ZS35.
Clearly, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-3 because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Panasonic ZS35 will give you greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged E-3 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ea84/2ea84d9998820d198c3f3a8e480c4d04c1cb2707" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS35 sensor size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS35 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4cf12/4cf12c1650e135744518084914e9bbc829058013" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2008-02-20 | 2014-01-06 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890 gr (1.96 lb) | 305 gr (0.67 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $670 | $300 |