Clicky

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS35

Portability
56
Imaging
44
Features
56
Overall
48
Olympus E-3 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 front
Portability
89
Imaging
40
Features
50
Overall
44

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs

Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
  • Launched February 2008
  • Replaced the Olympus E-1
  • Replacement is Olympus E-5
Panasonic ZS35
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
  • 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
  • Launched January 2014
  • Also referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ55
  • Previous Model is Panasonic ZS30
  • New Model is Panasonic ZS40
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview

The following is a comprehensive review of the Olympus E-3 versus Panasonic ZS35, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and ZS35 (16MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and ZS35 (1/2.3") boast different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-3 was released 6 years earlier than the ZS35 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS35 being a Compact camera.

Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-3 grades against the ZS35 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Panasonic ZS35

 E-3 ZS35 
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Screen typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Olympus E-3

 ZS35 E-3 
LaunchedJanuary 2014February 2008Newer by 71 months
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Panasonic ZS35

 E-3 ZS35 
Touch friendly screen Neither features Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to travel with your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-3 enjoys exterior dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") having a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS35 has specifications of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-3 versus Panasonic ZS35 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-3 versus the ZS35.

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS35 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-3 and ZS35 is 56 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS35 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading through a spec sheet. The pic here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-3 and ZS35.

Clearly, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-3 because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Panasonic ZS35 will give you greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged E-3 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS35 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-3 Portrait photography info
Panasonic ZS35 Portrait photography info
56
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
37
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
includes face detection focus
manual focus not available
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-3
Street photography with Panasonic ZS35
69
screen articulates fully
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
environment proof
68
screen tilts
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (305g)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-3 Sports photography highlights
Panasonic ZS35 Sports photography highlights
57
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
environment proof
has phase detect AF
low fps (5.0 frames per second)
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
53
great zoom range (24-480mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
includes tracking autofocus
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-3 as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic ZS35 as a Travel photography camera
55
environment proof
built-in flash
screen is selfie friendly
lack of Time Lapse recording
resolution not great (10MP)
68
lighter than competition (305g)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
very long zoom (480mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-3 as a Landscape photography camera
Panasonic ZS35 as a Landscape photography camera
56
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
environment proof
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
lack of Time Lapse recording
44
rather wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-3 Vlogging advice
Panasonic ZS35 Vlogging advice
18
no video recording
34
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (305g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-3 and Panasonic ZS35
 Olympus E-3Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35
General Information
Company Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-3 Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35
Also called - Lumix DMC-TZ55
Category Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2008-02-20 2014-01-06
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Highest enhanced ISO - 6400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 11 21
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-480mm (20.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.3-6.4
Macro focus range - 3cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fully Articulated Tilting
Screen sizing 2.5" 3"
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech - TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.58x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 5.0 frames per second 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 13.00 m 6.00 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 890 gr (1.96 lb) 305 gr (0.67 lb)
Physical dimensions 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.6 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.5 not tested
DXO Low light score 571 not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots One One
Pricing at release $670 $300