Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS50
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
90 Imaging
37 Features
57 Overall
45
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Introduced February 2008
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-1
- Later Model is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 243g - 111 x 65 x 34mm
- Launched January 2015
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ70
- Previous Model is Panasonic ZS45
- Successor is Panasonic ZS60
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS50 Overview
The following is a extensive overview of the Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS50, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the ZS50 (12MP) is very similar but the E-3 (Four Thirds) and ZS50 (1/2.3") have different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-3 was manufactured 7 years prior to the ZS50 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS50 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-3 matches up versus the ZS50 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS50 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-3 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-3 Gallery and Panasonic ZS50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Panasonic ZS50
E-3 | ZS50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS50 over the Olympus E-3
ZS50 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2015 | February 2008 | Newer by 83 months | |
Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Panasonic ZS50
E-3 | ZS50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS50 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-3 provides outer dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") and a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS50 has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 34mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS50 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the E-3 and the ZS50.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-3 and ZS50 is 56 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS50 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reading specs. The picture underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-3 and ZS50.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-3 because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Panasonic ZS50 will offer more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images way more aggressively. The more aged E-3 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS50 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ70 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2008-02-20 | 2015-01-06 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,166 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m | 6.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p/60i/30p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 890g (1.96 lbs) | 243g (0.54 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 111 x 65 x 34mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 56 | 44 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | 11.2 |
DXO Low light rating | 571 | 138 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $670 | $350 |