Olympus E-3 vs Pentax K-r
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1838c/1838cdf26d1a273bfc0958872d51c3945bf812d1" alt="Olympus E-3 front Olympus E-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2813a/2813afe340c3e203bd6902c7b27645af6433fc86" alt="Pentax K-r front Pentax K-r front"
67 Imaging
53 Features
52 Overall
52
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax K-r Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Introduced February 2008
- Old Model is Olympus E-1
- Updated by Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 598g - 125 x 97 x 68mm
- Introduced March 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax K-r Overview
Following is a detailed analysis of the Olympus E-3 and Pentax K-r, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the K-r (12MP) is pretty comparable but the E-3 (Four Thirds) and K-r (APS-C) boast different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-3 was brought out 4 years prior to the K-r which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax K-r being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-3 matches up versus the K-r when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax K-r Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-3 and Pentax K-r. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-3 Gallery and Pentax K-r Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Pentax K-r
E-3 | K-r | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-r over the Olympus E-3
K-r | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | March 2011 | ![]() | February 2008 | More modern by 37 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Pentax K-r
E-3 | K-r | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax K-r Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-3 has physical measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") along with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) and the Pentax K-r has specifications of 125mm x 97mm x 68mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 2.7") with a weight of 598 grams (1.32 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-3 and Pentax K-r in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-3 and the K-r.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3bc42/3bc42e40e570a05648b9821978d059f9ae5a2017" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Pentax K-r size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Pentax K-r size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-3 and K-r is 56 and 67 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f026b/f026b6d4281dfe576886da5e2843a5404e3063f1" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Pentax K-r top view buttons comparison Olympus E-3 vs Pentax K-r top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax K-r Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes only by seeing specs. The picture below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-3 and K-r.
As you can plainly see, both cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-3 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF more difficult and the Pentax K-r will show greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged E-3 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3441a/3441a05d8d0f68345e5fd9d57dbf0a3d3ceb8598" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Pentax K-r sensor size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Pentax K-r sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax K-r Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6899/b6899fc83d73db2ae216c70dfa308828d49863a3" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Pentax K-r Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-3 vs Pentax K-r Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax K-r Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Pentax K-r | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Pentax K-r |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2008-02-20 | 2011-03-11 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Prime II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 2848 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 11 |
Cross focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Number of lenses | 45 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Trailing Curtain Sync, High-Speed Sync and Wireless Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 secs | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (25 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890 grams (1.96 pounds) | 598 grams (1.32 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 125 x 97 x 68mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 2.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | 72 |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | 22.9 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | 12.4 |
DXO Low light score | 571 | 755 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 470 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI109,4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $670 | $1,100 |