Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-2
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Launched February 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-1
- Replacement is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Revealed February 2012
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-2 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-2, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and WG-2 (16MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and WG-2 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-3 was unveiled 5 years before the WG-2 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax WG-2 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-3 grades versus the WG-2 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-2 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-3 & Pentax Optio WG-2. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Pentax WG-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Pentax WG-2
E-3 | WG-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 over the Olympus E-3
WG-2 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2012 | February 2008 | More recent by 48 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Pentax WG-2
E-3 | WG-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-3 has physical dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") and a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) while the Pentax WG-2 has dimensions of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-2 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view size comparison of the E-3 against the WG-2.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-3 and WG-2 is 56 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-2 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements just by looking through specs. The graphic underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-3 and WG-2.
All in all, both the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-3 with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Pentax WG-2 will provide you with extra detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots more aggressively. The older E-3 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-2 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Pentax Optio WG-2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Pentax Optio WG-2 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Launched | 2008-02-20 | 2012-02-07 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 5.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890 grams (1.96 pounds) | 192 grams (0.42 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 shots |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $670 | $350 |