Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1838c/1838cdf26d1a273bfc0958872d51c3945bf812d1" alt="Olympus E-3 front Olympus E-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1b1a/c1b1aca5a367ce52d585dfa9c9ef670048d691fe" alt="Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS front Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Launched February 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-1
- Renewed by Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 198g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Announced February 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-3 versus Pentax WG-2 GPS, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Pentax. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and WG-2 GPS (16MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and WG-2 GPS (1/2.3") possess different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-3 was unveiled 5 years earlier than the WG-2 GPS which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax WG-2 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-3 matches up against the WG-2 GPS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-3 & Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Pentax WG-2 GPS
E-3 | WG-2 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 GPS over the Olympus E-3
WG-2 GPS | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2012 | ![]() | February 2008 | Newer by 48 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Pentax WG-2 GPS
E-3 | WG-2 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch display |
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera often, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-3 features outside dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") having a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) while the Pentax WG-2 GPS has dimensions of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-3 versus Pentax WG-2 GPS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Here is the front view scale comparison of the E-3 compared to the WG-2 GPS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d0c2/2d0c2f68c31c0bde3b78a99a4a09a17d0f4c5940" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-3 and WG-2 GPS is 56 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef071/ef07121ae41274eb7ac530c861561562bef26c0b" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions just by researching specifications. The picture here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-3 and WG-2 GPS.
Plainly, both the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-3 using its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Pentax WG-2 GPS will result in greater detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-3 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c69e/1c69e31ac31b3b814c67bdd475af715546b00556" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS sensor size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd90c/dd90c6b00eac16c0931f671d1061e13f90d2d8e6" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Launched | 2008-02-20 | 2012-02-07 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 5.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890 gr (1.96 pounds) | 198 gr (0.44 pounds) |
Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $670 | $300 |