Clicky

Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS

Portability
56
Imaging
45
Features
56
Overall
49
Olympus E-3 front
 
Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS front
Portability
91
Imaging
39
Features
37
Overall
38

Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Key Specs

Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
  • Launched February 2008
  • Superseded the Olympus E-1
  • Renewed by Olympus E-5
Pentax WG-2 GPS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 198g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
  • Announced February 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Overview

Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-3 versus Pentax WG-2 GPS, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Pentax. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and WG-2 GPS (16MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and WG-2 GPS (1/2.3") possess different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-3 was unveiled 5 years earlier than the WG-2 GPS which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax WG-2 GPS being a Compact camera.

Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-3 matches up against the WG-2 GPS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Pentax WG-2 GPS

 E-3 WG-2 GPS 
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 GPS over the Olympus E-3

 WG-2 GPS E-3 
AnnouncedFebruary 2012February 2008Newer by 48 months
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Pentax WG-2 GPS

 E-3 WG-2 GPS 
Manual focus More precise focus
Touch display Neither includes Touch display

Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Physical Comparison

If you're intending to travel with your camera often, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-3 features outside dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") having a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) while the Pentax WG-2 GPS has dimensions of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-3 versus Pentax WG-2 GPS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Here is the front view scale comparison of the E-3 compared to the WG-2 GPS.

Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-3 and WG-2 GPS is 56 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be hard to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions just by researching specifications. The picture here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-3 and WG-2 GPS.

Plainly, both the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-3 using its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Pentax WG-2 GPS will result in greater detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-3 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-3 as a Portrait photography camera
Pentax WG-2 GPS as a Portrait photography camera
57
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
MP count low (10 megapixels)
40
you can focus manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection focusing
no manual control
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-3 Street photography highlights
Pentax WG-2 GPS Street photography highlights
70
screen can move to multiple angles
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
weather sealing
54
environment sealing
no moving screen
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-3 as a Sports photography camera
Pentax WG-2 GPS as a Sports photography camera
58
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
weather sealing
supports phase detect auto focus
slow frames per second (5.0 frames per second)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
38
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
environment sealing
continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-3 Travel photography info
Pentax WG-2 GPS Travel photography info
55
weather sealing
has built in flash
screen is selfie friendly
no Timelapse mode
MP count low (10 megapixels)
70
environment sealing
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
quite wide (28mm)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-3 Landscape photography factors
Pentax WG-2 GPS Landscape photography factors
56
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
weather sealing
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
MP count low (10MP)
no Timelapse mode
47
you can focus manually
quite wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3")
good megapixels (16MP)
environment sealing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-3 Vlogging information
Pentax WG-2 GPS Vlogging information
18
can't shoot video
30
quite wide (28mm)
comes with face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
lack of external microphone jack
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-3 and Pentax WG-2 GPS
 Olympus E-3Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Pentax
Model Olympus E-3 Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS
Class Advanced DSLR Waterproof
Launched 2008-02-20 2012-02-07
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 3200 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 125
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 11 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.5-5.5
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5" 3"
Resolution of display 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display tech - Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.58x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 5.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 13.00 m 5.40 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 890 gr (1.96 pounds) 198 gr (0.44 pounds)
Dimensions 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.6 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.5 not tested
DXO Low light score 571 not tested
Other
Battery life - 260 photos
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Retail cost $670 $300