Olympus E-3 vs Pentax Q-S1
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1838c/1838cdf26d1a273bfc0958872d51c3945bf812d1" alt="Olympus E-3 front Olympus E-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd627/dd6277e99ef9f564cea30d5ecbfa8cecd5214610" alt="Pentax Q-S1 front Pentax Q-S1 front"
92 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Released February 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-1
- Replacement is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
- Released August 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Olympus E-3 versus Pentax Q-S1, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the Q-S1 (12MP) is fairly well matched but the E-3 (Four Thirds) and Q-S1 (1/1.7") use totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-3 was released 7 years prior to the Q-S1 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax Q-S1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise view of how the E-3 scores versus the Q-S1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax Q-S1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-3 & Pentax Q-S1. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Pentax Q-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Pentax Q-S1
E-3 | Q-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Olympus E-3
Q-S1 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2014 | ![]() | February 2008 | More modern by 78 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Pentax Q-S1
E-3 | Q-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-3 comes with outside dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") having a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) whilst the Pentax Q-S1 has sizing of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-3 versus Pentax Q-S1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at the time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the E-3 vs the Q-S1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46927/469270385263039f7bf42630be907541eedbfacd" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-3 and Q-S1 is 56 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dca47/dca4729bad7344980d2e092af0c3eeda46587e86" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-3 vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to see the difference between sensor sizes only by reading through specs. The image below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-3 and Q-S1.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-3 due to its larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Pentax Q-S1 will resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged E-3 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/056ff/056ff0c8d8298177349a4cd5cde9834872d55598" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/399d1/399d19dc0833e3a4924d0f9c53eca84a91f2cdc5" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-3 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Pentax Q-S1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Pentax Q-S1 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2008-02-20 | 2014-08-04 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Q Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax Q |
Number of lenses | 45 | 8 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 4.90 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890g (1.96 pounds) | 203g (0.45 pounds) |
Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 250 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $670 | $250 |