Olympus E-3 vs Pentax Q7
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1838c/1838cdf26d1a273bfc0958872d51c3945bf812d1" alt="Olympus E-3 front Olympus E-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff182/ff18240782b3e81fef5b6699b11da2b99c864ba8" alt="Pentax Q7 front Pentax Q7 front"
92 Imaging
37 Features
54 Overall
43
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax Q7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Released February 2008
- Previous Model is Olympus E-1
- Newer Model is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 200g - 102 x 58 x 34mm
- Announced August 2013
- Previous Model is Pentax Q10
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax Q7 Overview
In this write-up, we will be looking at the Olympus E-3 versus Pentax Q7, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the Q7 (12MP) is relatively well matched but the E-3 (Four Thirds) and Q7 (1/1.7") feature different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-3 was announced 6 years earlier than the Q7 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax Q7 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple overview of how the E-3 grades against the Q7 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax Q7 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-3 & Pentax Q7. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Pentax Q7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Pentax Q7
E-3 | Q7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Pentax Q7 over the Olympus E-3
Q7 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2013 | ![]() | February 2008 | Newer by 66 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Pentax Q7
E-3 | Q7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax Q7 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-3 features outer measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) whilst the Pentax Q7 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-3 versus Pentax Q7 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-3 and the Q7.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6490b/6490b246cea3f8761e26568e219e613852335080" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Pentax Q7 size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Pentax Q7 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-3 and Q7 is 56 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5bf55/5bf5591bd34c26b501ace7e978b6ac79c65a2b7f" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Pentax Q7 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-3 vs Pentax Q7 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax Q7 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to picture the difference between sensor dimensions only by checking a spec sheet. The picture underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-3 and Q7.
As you can see, the 2 cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-3 having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Pentax Q7 will give extra detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged E-3 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50a42/50a421b26137cfecd0031cf82a7f612da1864765" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Pentax Q7 sensor size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Pentax Q7 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax Q7 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b06bc/b06bcf6f8cc2696693de563853f6db6eeb4c561a" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Pentax Q7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-3 vs Pentax Q7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax Q7 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Pentax Q7 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Pentax Q7 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2008-02-20 | 2013-08-08 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax Q |
Available lenses | 45 | 8 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD monitor, wide angle viewing, AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 4.90 m (ISO100/m) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | P-TTL, Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Trailing Curtain Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250s | 1/2000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | FullHD(1920x1080, 30fps/25fps/24fps), HD(1280x720,16:9,30fps/25fps/24fps), VGA(640x480,4:3,30fps/25fps/24fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890 grams (1.96 pounds) | 200 grams (0.44 pounds) |
Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 102 x 58 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 250 pictures |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 sec, 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD, SDHC, SDXC and Eye-Fi Card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $670 | $480 |