Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh CX1
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48


93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Released February 2008
- Older Model is Olympus E-1
- Updated by Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2009

Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Olympus E-3 versus Ricoh CX1, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the CX1 (9MP) is fairly comparable but the E-3 (Four Thirds) and CX1 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizing.

The E-3 was brought out 12 months earlier than the CX1 which means that they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summation of how the E-3 matches up versus the CX1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-3 & Ricoh CX1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Ricoh CX1
E-3 | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus E-3
CX1 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2009 | ![]() | February 2008 | Newer by 12 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Ricoh CX1
E-3 | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-3 provides exterior measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) and the Ricoh CX1 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-3 versus Ricoh CX1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is a front view scale comparison of the E-3 compared to the CX1.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-3 and CX1 is 56 and 93 respectively.

Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions purely by seeing specs. The picture here may provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-3 and CX1.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-3 featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-3 will show more detail having its extra 1MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The more aged E-3 will be behind in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Ricoh CX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus E-3 | Ricoh CX1 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2008-02-20 | 2009-02-19 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 9MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3456 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.2 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 890g (1.96 lbs) | 180g (0.40 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | DB-70 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $670 | $299 |