Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh CX4
56 Imaging
43 Features
56 Overall
48
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Introduced February 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-1
- Updated by Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed August 2010
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
Below is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh CX4, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the CX4 (10MP) is pretty comparable but the E-3 (Four Thirds) and CX4 (1/2.3") provide different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-3 was announced 3 years before the CX4 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the E-3 matches up against the CX4 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-3 and Ricoh CX4. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-3 Gallery and Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Ricoh CX4
| E-3 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Olympus E-3
| CX4 | E-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2010 | February 2008 | More recent by 30 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Ricoh CX4
| E-3 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-3 enjoys physical measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") having a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) and the Ricoh CX4 has specifications of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh CX4 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the E-3 compared to the CX4.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-3 and CX4 is 56 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements only by seeing specs. The photograph below will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-3 and CX4.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have the same megapixels albeit different sensor measurements. The E-3 comes with the bigger sensor which will make achieving shallow depth of field easier. The older E-3 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
| Olympus E-3 | Ricoh CX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus E-3 | Ricoh CX4 |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2008-02-20 | 2010-08-19 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 13.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 890 grams (1.96 pounds) | 205 grams (0.45 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $670 | $211 |