Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh CX5
56 Imaging
43 Features
56 Overall
48
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh CX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Launched February 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-1
- New Model is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh CX5 Overview
The following is a extensive assessment of the Olympus E-3 and Ricoh CX5, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the CX5 (10MP) is pretty comparable but the E-3 (Four Thirds) and CX5 (1/2.3") use different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-3 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the CX5 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Ricoh CX5 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-3 scores against the CX5 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh CX5 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-3 & Ricoh CX5. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Ricoh CX5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Ricoh CX5
| E-3 | CX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Olympus E-3
| CX5 | E-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2011 | February 2008 | Newer by 41 months | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Ricoh CX5
| E-3 | CX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh CX5 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-3 features external measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") having a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) while the Ricoh CX5 has proportions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-3 and Ricoh CX5 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is the front view scale comparison of the E-3 against the CX5.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-3 and CX5 is 56 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh CX5 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions merely by checking out technical specs. The pic below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-3 and CX5.
As you have seen, each of these cameras posses the exact same MP albeit different sensor dimensions. The E-3 offers the bigger sensor which should make obtaining shallower depth of field simpler. The more aged E-3 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh CX5 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh CX5 Specifications
| Olympus E-3 | Ricoh CX5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus E-3 | Ricoh CX5 |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2008-02-20 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 13.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 890 gr (1.96 lb) | 205 gr (0.45 lb) |
| Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 571 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $670 | $399 |