Clicky

Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh GR

Portability
56
Imaging
44
Features
56
Overall
48
Olympus E-3 front
 
Ricoh GR front
Portability
90
Imaging
57
Features
54
Overall
55

Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs

Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
  • Introduced February 2008
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-1
  • New Model is Olympus E-5
Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8) lens
  • 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
  • Launched April 2013
  • Replacement is Ricoh GR II
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh GR Overview

Here, we are evaluating the Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh GR, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and GR (16MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and GR (APS-C) provide totally different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-3 was released 6 years earlier than the GR which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the E-3 grades vs the GR when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Ricoh GR

 E-3 GR 
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Olympus E-3

 GR E-3 
LaunchedApril 2013February 2008More modern by 62 months
Display size3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution1230k230kClearer display (+1000k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Ricoh GR

 E-3 GR 
Manual focus Dial accurate focusing
Touch display No Touch display

Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-3 enjoys external dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") along with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) while the Ricoh GR has dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh GR in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the E-3 versus the GR.

Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh GR size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-3 and GR is 56 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh GR top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is hard to see the gap between sensor sizes simply by reading technical specs. The picture below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-3 and GR.

As you can tell, each of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-3 because of its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Ricoh GR will offer greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-3 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh GR sensor size comparison

Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh GR Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-3 Portrait photography features
Ricoh GR Portrait photography features
56
has manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
74
focusing manually
high flash sync speed (1/4,000s)
good megapixels (16MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-3 Street photography information
Ricoh GR Street photography information
69
screen can move to multiple angles
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
weather sealing
74
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than competition (245g)
very good high ISO (25,600)
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-3
Sports photography with Ricoh GR
57
great max shutter speed (1/8,000s)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
weather sealing
has phase detect auto focus
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
45
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
can't change focal length (28mm)
max fps low (4.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-3
Travel photography with Ricoh GR
55
weather sealing
built-in flash
display is selfie friendly
lack of Time Lapse function
sensor resolution low (10MP)
71
lighter than competition (245 grams)
good megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-3 Landscape photography features
Ricoh GR Landscape photography features
56
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
weather sealing
tiny screen (2.5 inch)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
lack of Time Lapse function
61
focusing manually
good sized screen (3")
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
very good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-3 Vlogging info
Ricoh GR Vlogging info
18
no video shooting
30
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition (245 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have microphone port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh GR Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-3 and Ricoh GR
 Olympus E-3Ricoh GR
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus E-3 Ricoh GR
Category Advanced DSLR Large Sensor Compact
Introduced 2008-02-20 2013-04-17
Body design Mid-size SLR Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.7 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 372.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4928 x 3264
Highest native ISO 3200 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 11 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28mm (1x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.8
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 1,230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) Optical (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.58x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 300s
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 5.0 frames/s 4.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 13.00 m 5.40 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye -
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250s 1/4000s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 890 gr (1.96 lb) 245 gr (0.54 lb)
Physical dimensions 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 56 78
DXO Color Depth rating 21.6 23.6
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.5 13.5
DXO Low light rating 571 972
Other
Battery life - 290 photographs
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID - DB65
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD, SDHC, SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at release $670 $971