Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh GR
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Introduced February 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-1
- New Model is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Launched April 2013
- Replacement is Ricoh GR II
Photography Glossary Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh GR Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh GR, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and GR (16MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and GR (APS-C) provide totally different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-3 was released 6 years earlier than the GR which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the E-3 grades vs the GR when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh GR Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-3 and Ricoh GR. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-3 Gallery and Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Ricoh GR
| E-3 | GR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Olympus E-3
| GR | E-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2013 | February 2008 | More modern by 62 months | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 1230k | 230k | Clearer display (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Ricoh GR
| E-3 | GR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Touch display | No Touch display |
Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-3 enjoys external dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") along with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) while the Ricoh GR has dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh GR in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the E-3 versus the GR.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-3 and GR is 56 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to see the gap between sensor sizes simply by reading technical specs. The picture below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-3 and GR.
As you can tell, each of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-3 because of its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Ricoh GR will offer greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-3 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh GR Specifications
| Olympus E-3 | Ricoh GR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus E-3 | Ricoh GR |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Large Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2008-02-20 | 2013-04-17 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 372.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28mm (1x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8 |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (optional) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 300s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 13.00 m | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/250s | 1/4000s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 890 gr (1.96 lb) | 245 gr (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 56 | 78 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | 23.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | 13.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | 571 | 972 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 290 photographs |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | DB65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $670 | $971 |