Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh WG-30
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Announced February 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-1
- Replacement is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced October 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Olympus E-3 versus Ricoh WG-30, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and WG-30 (16MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and WG-30 (1/2.3") possess different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-3 was unveiled 7 years prior to the WG-30 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Ricoh WG-30 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-3 scores against the WG-30 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-3 & Ricoh WG-30. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Ricoh WG-30
| E-3 | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Olympus E-3
| WG-30 | E-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | October 2014 | February 2008 | Newer by 80 months | |
| Display dimension | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Ricoh WG-30
| E-3 | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | The same display resolution | |
| Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-3 offers external measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-30 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-3 versus Ricoh WG-30 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the E-3 and the WG-30.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-3 and WG-30 is 56 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions just by looking through specifications. The picture underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-3 and WG-30.
To sum up, each of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-3 using its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Ricoh WG-30 will render more detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-3 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
| Olympus E-3 | Ricoh WG-30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus E-3 | Ricoh WG-30 |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2008-02-20 | 2014-10-09 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 13.00 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 890 grams (1.96 lb) | 192 grams (0.42 lb) |
| Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 571 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $670 | $428 |