Clicky

Olympus E-3 vs Samsung DV300F

Portability
56
Imaging
44
Features
56
Overall
48
Olympus E-3 front
 
Samsung DV300F front
Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
33
Overall
36

Olympus E-3 vs Samsung DV300F Key Specs

Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
  • Revealed February 2008
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-1
  • Renewed by Olympus E-5
Samsung DV300F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
  • 133g - 95 x 57 x 18mm
  • Released January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-3 vs Samsung DV300F Overview

Lets look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-3 and Samsung DV300F, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and DV300F (16MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and DV300F (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-3 was manufactured 4 years before the DV300F and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung DV300F being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-3 scores against the DV300F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Samsung DV300F

 E-3 DV300F 
Focus manually More precise focusing
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Samsung DV300F over the Olympus E-3

 DV300F E-3 
ReleasedJanuary 2012February 2008Fresher by 47 months
Screen sizing3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Samsung DV300F

 E-3 DV300F 
Touch friendly screen Neither provides Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-3 vs Samsung DV300F Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-3 provides outer dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) and the Samsung DV300F has proportions of 95mm x 57mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-3 and Samsung DV300F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-3 versus the DV300F.

Olympus E-3 vs Samsung DV300F size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-3 and DV300F is 56 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-3 vs Samsung DV300F top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-3 vs Samsung DV300F Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizing purely by researching a spec sheet. The visual below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-3 and DV300F.

As you can see, each of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-3 because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Samsung DV300F will render more detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a little more aggressively. The older E-3 will be behind in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-3 vs Samsung DV300F sensor size comparison

Olympus E-3 vs Samsung DV300F Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-3 vs Samsung DV300F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-3 Portrait photography factors
Samsung DV300F Portrait photography factors
56
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
sensor resolution low (10MP)
34
MP count good (16 megapixels)
includes face detect autofocus
focusing manually not possible
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-3 as a Street photography camera
Samsung DV300F as a Street photography camera
69
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
weather proof
63
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (133 grams)
no moving screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-3 Sports photography advice
Samsung DV300F Sports photography advice
57
high shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
weather proof
sensor has phase detect auto focus
low frames per second (5.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
44
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-3 Travel photography details
Samsung DV300F Travel photography details
55
weather proof
built-in flash
display is selfie friendly
lack of Time Lapse function
sensor resolution low (10MP)
69
lighter than competitors in class (133 grams)
MP count good (16MP)
has built in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-3 Landscape photography features
Samsung DV300F Landscape photography features
56
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
weather proof
screen is small (2.5")
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
lack of Time Lapse function
43
fairly wide (25mm)
screen is a good size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
no manual exposure
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
missing Time Lapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-3 Vlogging advice
Samsung DV300F Vlogging advice
18
can't shoot video
33
fairly wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect autofocus
lighter than competitors in class (133 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing mic jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-3 vs Samsung DV300F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-3 and Samsung DV300F
 Olympus E-3Samsung DV300F
General Information
Brand Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus E-3 Samsung DV300F
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2008-02-20 2012-01-02
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 11 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-125mm (5.0x)
Max aperture - f/2.5-6.3
Macro focus distance - 5cm
Available lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.58x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 16s
Max shutter speed 1/8000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed 5.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 13.00 m 4.10 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 890 gr (1.96 pounds) 133 gr (0.29 pounds)
Dimensions 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") 95 x 57 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.6 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.5 not tested
DXO Low light score 571 not tested
Other
Battery model - BP88
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card MicroSD, MicroSDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Price at release $670 $200