Olympus E-3 vs Samsung HZ30W
56 Imaging
43 Features
56 Overall
48
91 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
Olympus E-3 vs Samsung HZ30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Announced February 2008
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-1
- Replacement is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched January 2010
- Also Known as WB600
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-3 vs Samsung HZ30W Overview
Here is a thorough comparison of the Olympus E-3 versus Samsung HZ30W, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the HZ30W (12MP) is fairly close but the E-3 (Four Thirds) and HZ30W (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-3 was announced 23 months before the HZ30W making them a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung HZ30W being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the E-3 matches up versus the HZ30W with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Olympus E-3 vs Samsung HZ30W Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-3 & Samsung HZ30W. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Samsung HZ30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Samsung HZ30W
| E-3 | HZ30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ30W over the Olympus E-3
| HZ30W | E-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2010 | February 2008 | Fresher by 23 months | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Samsung HZ30W
| E-3 | HZ30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
| Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Olympus E-3 vs Samsung HZ30W Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-3 features outer measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") along with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) while the Samsung HZ30W has measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Olympus E-3 versus Samsung HZ30W in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-3 against the HZ30W.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-3 and HZ30W is 56 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Samsung HZ30W Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to see the gap in sensor sizing purely by looking through specifications. The graphic underneath might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-3 and HZ30W.
Plainly, both cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-3 using its larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Samsung HZ30W will provide you with greater detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics way more aggressively. The older E-3 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-3 vs Samsung HZ30W Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-3 vs Samsung HZ30W Specifications
| Olympus E-3 | Samsung HZ30W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus E-3 | Samsung HZ30W |
| Also Known as | - | WB600 |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2008-02-20 | 2010-01-19 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 16 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 13.00 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 890g (1.96 lb) | 245g (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 571 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SC/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $670 | $280 |