Olympus E-3 vs Samsung MV800
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1838c/1838cdf26d1a273bfc0958872d51c3945bf812d1" alt="Olympus E-3 front Olympus E-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4e12/b4e122b2aaa28d2f9d004ee8fcbd6e8de420bece" alt="Samsung MV800 front Samsung MV800 front"
97 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Olympus E-3 vs Samsung MV800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Revealed February 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-1
- Successor is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
- Announced September 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Samsung MV800 Overview
Below is a detailed analysis of the Olympus E-3 versus Samsung MV800, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and MV800 (16MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and MV800 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-3 was released 4 years before the MV800 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung MV800 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the E-3 grades versus the MV800 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Samsung MV800 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-3 & Samsung MV800. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Samsung MV800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Samsung MV800
E-3 | MV800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung MV800 over the Olympus E-3
MV800 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2011 | ![]() | February 2008 | More recent by 42 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Samsung MV800
E-3 | MV800 |
---|
Olympus E-3 vs Samsung MV800 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-3 comes with physical dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) while the Samsung MV800 has proportions of 92mm x 56mm x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-3 versus Samsung MV800 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that moment. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the E-3 compared to the MV800.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3da0a/3da0ac10f4c791ae19a8e7fd27f89c2ca553fa2b" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Samsung MV800 size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Samsung MV800 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-3 and MV800 is 56 and 97 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88a55/88a55415a7eedbda40dbc6a1d05888d59979fe43" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Samsung MV800 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-3 vs Samsung MV800 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Samsung MV800 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements only by looking at a spec sheet. The visual here might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-3 and MV800.
As you can see, both the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-3 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Samsung MV800 will give more detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The older E-3 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b16b6/b16b67f3fb4d7a59b6f1bff6d9ca1f73a2dcd456" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Samsung MV800 sensor size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Samsung MV800 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Samsung MV800 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff773/ff77369f11a95edb3739ddaa533549ea1e1188f7" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Samsung MV800 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-3 vs Samsung MV800 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Samsung MV800 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Samsung MV800 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus E-3 | Samsung MV800 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2008-02-20 | 2011-09-01 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m | 3.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 890 grams (1.96 lbs) | 121 grams (0.27 lbs) |
Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | BP70 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Micro SD |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $670 | $499 |