Clicky

Olympus E-3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
56
Imaging
44
Features
56
Overall
48
Olympus E-3 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
62
Features
38
Overall
52

Olympus E-3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
  • Released February 2008
  • Old Model is Olympus E-1
  • New Model is Olympus E-5
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Revealed February 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

In this write-up, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sigma. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-3 was released 7 years earlier than the DP2 Quattro which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before we go through a full comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-3 matches up versus the DP2 Quattro in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 E-3 DP2 Quattro 
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Olympus E-3

 DP2 Quattro E-3 
RevealedFebruary 2014February 2008More modern by 72 months
Screen sizing3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution920k230kClearer screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 E-3 DP2 Quattro 
Focus manually More exact focusing
Touch friendly screen Absent Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-3 features physical dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") along with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Quattro has specifications of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-3 and the DP2 Quattro.

Olympus E-3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-3 and DP2 Quattro is 56 and 70 respectively.

Olympus E-3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its tough to see the contrast between sensor sizes only by reading a spec sheet. The picture below might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-3 and DP2 Quattro.

Clearly, each of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-3 featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh trickier and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will offer you more detail as a result of its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged E-3 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Olympus E-3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-3
Portrait photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
56
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
77
manual focus
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
has face detect autofocus
supports RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-3
Street photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
69
fully articulated screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
weather proofing
61
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW files
no moving screen
no image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-3 as a Sports photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Sports photography camera
57
high shutter speed (1/8,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
weather proofing
comes with phase detect AF
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
low resolution sensor (10MP)
47
megapixel count decent (20MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
can't change focal length (45mm)
max fps very slow (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
lacks phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-3 Travel photography information
Sigma DP2 Quattro Travel photography information
55
weather proofing
flash built-in
display is selfie friendly
does not have Time Lapse mode
low resolution sensor (10MP)
53
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-3 Landscape photography features
Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography features
56
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
weather proofing
screen is small (2.5")
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
does not have Time Lapse mode
59
manual focus
nice screen size (3 inches)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (45mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-3
Vlogging with Sigma DP2 Quattro
18
no video shooting
9
lack of video recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-3 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Olympus E-3Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Brand Olympus Sigma
Model Olympus E-3 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Category Advanced DSLR Large Sensor Compact
Released 2008-02-20 2014-02-13
Body design Mid-size SLR Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III TRUE III engine
Sensor type CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 5424 x 3616
Max native ISO 3200 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 11 9
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 45mm (1x)
Max aperture - f/2.8
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5" 3"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.58x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 5.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 13.00 m no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye no built-in flash
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash sync 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Max video resolution None None
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 890 grams (1.96 lbs) 395 grams (0.87 lbs)
Dimensions 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.6 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.5 not tested
DXO Low light score 571 not tested
Other
Battery model - BP-51
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card -
Storage slots 1 1
Price at release $670 $931