Olympus E-3 vs Sony NEX-3N
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
89 Imaging
56 Features
52 Overall
54
Olympus E-3 vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Revealed February 2008
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
- Introduced February 2013
- Old Model is Sony NEX-F3
- Renewed by Sony a5000
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-3 vs Sony NEX-3N Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-3 versus Sony NEX-3N, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and NEX-3N (16MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and NEX-3N (APS-C) posses totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-3 was announced 6 years prior to the NEX-3N which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-3 grades vs the NEX-3N when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-3 vs Sony NEX-3N Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-3 and Sony Alpha NEX-3N. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-3 Gallery and Sony NEX-3N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Sony NEX-3N
| E-3 | NEX-3N | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Olympus E-3
| NEX-3N | E-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2013 | February 2008 | More modern by 61 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Sony NEX-3N
| E-3 | NEX-3N | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-3 vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-3 offers outside measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") and a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) and the Sony NEX-3N has dimensions of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-3 versus Sony NEX-3N in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-3 against the NEX-3N.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-3 and NEX-3N is 56 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to see the contrast in sensor sizes merely by looking through a spec sheet. The picture here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-3 and NEX-3N.
Clearly, both of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-3 with its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Sony NEX-3N will result in more detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-3 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-3 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-3 vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications
| Olympus E-3 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus E-3 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2008-02-20 | 2013-02-25 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 16000 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | 121 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Display size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 4.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 13.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/250 secs | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 890g (1.96 lbs) | 269g (0.59 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 56 | 74 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | 12.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | 571 | 1067 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 480 photographs |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $670 | $399 |