Olympus E-3 vs Sony NEX-C3
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1838c/1838cdf26d1a273bfc0958872d51c3945bf812d1" alt="Olympus E-3 front Olympus E-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2cec1/2cec10f20284888a461f10799c9bdd17f4863091" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-C3 front Sony Alpha NEX-C3 front"
91 Imaging
56 Features
57 Overall
56
Olympus E-3 vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Introduced February 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
- Introduced August 2011
- Succeeded the Sony NEX-3
- New Model is Sony NEX-F3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Olympus E-3 vs Sony NEX-C3, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and NEX-C3 (16MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and NEX-C3 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-3 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the NEX-C3 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-3 grades against the NEX-C3 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Sony NEX-C3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-3 & Sony Alpha NEX-C3. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Sony NEX-C3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Sony NEX-C3
E-3 | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Olympus E-3
NEX-C3 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2011 | ![]() | February 2008 | More modern by 42 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Sony NEX-C3
E-3 | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch display |
Olympus E-3 vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-3 offers outside measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) while the Sony NEX-C3 has specifications of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
See the Olympus E-3 vs Sony NEX-C3 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the E-3 vs the NEX-C3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf393/cf393cac5c1cce0afd88e694f73dfd93f6010006" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Sony NEX-C3 size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Sony NEX-C3 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-3 and NEX-C3 is 56 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9af8/e9af87ccea1e4b1d3236c3e85eb1eb40f0297eab" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Sony NEX-C3 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-3 vs Sony NEX-C3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizes purely by looking at technical specs. The pic below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-3 and NEX-C3.
As you can tell, each of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-3 featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Sony NEX-C3 will give greater detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images way more aggressively. The more aged E-3 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08ed3/08ed37f71897191f2c7312786e20b316201a5c86" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Sony NEX-C3 sensor size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Sony NEX-C3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eee71/eee71c42e6d58a4761608ca2d3b1f0e6964c4990" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-3 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2008-02-20 | 2011-08-22 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Available lenses | 45 | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890 gr (1.96 pounds) | 225 gr (0.50 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | 12.2 |
DXO Low light score | 571 | 1083 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $670 | $343 |