Olympus E-3 vs Sony H50
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
69 Imaging
32 Features
25 Overall
29
Olympus E-3 vs Sony H50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Launched February 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-1
- Successor is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-465mm (F2.7-4.5) lens
- 547g - 116 x 81 x 86mm
- Released January 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-3 vs Sony H50 Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Olympus E-3 versus Sony H50, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the H50 (9MP) is very comparable but the E-3 (Four Thirds) and H50 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-3 was unveiled 11 months prior to the H50 and they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony H50 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-3 scores versus the H50 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-3 vs Sony H50 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-3 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-3 Gallery and Sony H50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Sony H50
| E-3 | H50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony H50 over the Olympus E-3
| H50 | E-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2009 |  | February 2008 | Fresher by 11 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Sony H50
| E-3 | H50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus E-3 vs Sony H50 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-3 has got external dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") having a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) whilst the Sony H50 has specifications of 116mm x 81mm x 86mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.4") with a weight of 547 grams (1.21 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-3 versus Sony H50 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the E-3 vs the H50.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-3 and H50 is 56 and 69 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Sony H50 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing only by going through technical specs. The visual underneath may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-3 and H50.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-3 having a larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-3 will show greater detail having an extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older E-3 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus E-3 vs Sony H50 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-3 vs Sony H50 Specifications
| Olympus E-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus E-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50 |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2008-02-20 | 2009-01-15 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 31-465mm (15.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/2.7-4.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 13.00 m | 9.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480, 30 fps, 320 x 240, 8 fps |
| Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 890 grams (1.96 lb) | 547 grams (1.21 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 116 x 81 x 86mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 571 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | NP-BG1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $670 | $80 |