Olympus E-3 vs Sony H55
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
92 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
Olympus E-3 vs Sony H55 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Revealed February 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-1
- Renewed by Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 200g - 103 x 58 x 29mm
- Released June 2010
Olympus E-3 vs Sony H55 Overview
Following is a in depth review of the Olympus E-3 vs Sony H55, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and H55 (14MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and H55 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-3 was launched 3 years prior to the H55 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony H55 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-3 matches up versus the H55 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-3 vs Sony H55 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-3 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Sony H55 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Sony H55
E-3 | H55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony H55 over the Olympus E-3
H55 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2010 | February 2008 | More modern by 28 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Sony H55
E-3 | H55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Same screen resolution | |
Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Olympus E-3 vs Sony H55 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-3 enjoys outer dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") along with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) while the Sony H55 has proportions of 103mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-3 vs Sony H55 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-3 compared to the H55.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-3 and H55 is 56 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Sony H55 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes merely by checking out technical specs. The pic underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-3 and H55.
As you have seen, both the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-3 due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Sony H55 will show more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged E-3 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-3 vs Sony H55 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-3 vs Sony H55 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2008-02-20 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 3.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Slow Syncro, Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890 gr (1.96 lbs) | 200 gr (0.44 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 103 x 58 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo/ PRO HG-Duo, SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $670 | $235 |