Olympus E-3 vs Sony S980
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
94 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus E-3 vs Sony S980 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Announced February 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-1
- Successor is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 33-132mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 167g - 93 x 56 x 24mm
- Launched February 2009
Olympus E-3 vs Sony S980 Overview
In this write-up, we will be looking at the Olympus E-3 and Sony S980, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the S980 (12MP) is relatively similar but the E-3 (Four Thirds) and S980 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-3 was revealed 12 months prior to the S980 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony S980 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the E-3 matches up vs the S980 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-3 vs Sony S980 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-3 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S980. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Sony S980 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Sony S980
E-3 | S980 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony S980 over the Olympus E-3
S980 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2009 | February 2008 | More recent by 12 months | |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Sony S980
E-3 | S980 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Same screen resolution | |
Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus E-3 vs Sony S980 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-3 provides exterior dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") having a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) whilst the Sony S980 has measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-3 and Sony S980 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the E-3 vs the S980.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-3 and S980 is 56 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Sony S980 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to see the contrast between sensor measurements only by going over technical specs. The photograph underneath should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-3 and S980.
As you have seen, both of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-3 having a bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Sony S980 will offer you greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older E-3 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-3 vs Sony S980 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-3 vs Sony S980 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S980 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S980 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2008-02-20 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-5.2 |
Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 2s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890 gr (1.96 pounds) | 167 gr (0.37 pounds) |
Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 93 x 56 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $670 | $300 |