Sony QX1 vs Sony H200
90 Imaging
63 Features
48 Overall
57
![Sony Alpha QX1 front Sony Alpha QX1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Alpha-QX1/Sony-QX1-front.jpg)
![Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H200/Sony-H200-front.jpg)
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Sony QX1 vs Sony H200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
- Released September 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Released January 2013
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Sony QX1 vs Sony H200 Overview
The following is a extended review of the Sony QX1 versus Sony H200, former is a Lens-style while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both offered by Sony. The resolution of the QX1 (20MP) and the H200 (20MP) is relatively close but the QX1 (APS-C) and H200 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor size.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
The QX1 was manufactured 21 months after the H200 which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the QX1 matches up versus the H200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Sony QX1 vs Sony H200 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Sony Alpha QX1 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The entire galleries are provided at Sony QX1 Gallery & Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Sony H200
QX1 | H200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2014 | ![]() | January 2013 | Newer by 21 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Sony QX1
H200 | QX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | " | Bigger screen (+3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 0k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Sony QX1 and Sony H200
QX1 | H200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Sony QX1 vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Sony QX1 provides external dimensions of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") and a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Sony H200 has dimensions of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") accompanied by a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Contrast the Sony QX1 versus Sony H200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the QX1 vs the H200.
![Sony QX1 vs Sony H200 size comparison Sony QX1 vs Sony H200 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Sony-Alpha-QX1-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H200-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the QX1 and H200 is 90 and 67 respectively.
![Sony QX1 vs Sony H200 top view buttons comparison Sony QX1 vs Sony H200 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Sony-Alpha-QX1-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H200-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Sony QX1 vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions only by viewing specs. The image below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the QX1 and H200.
All in all, each of the cameras provide the same megapixels albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The QX1 contains the bigger sensor which should make achieving bokeh easier. The more modern QX1 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
![Sony QX1 vs Sony H200 sensor size comparison Sony QX1 vs Sony H200 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Sony-Alpha-QX1-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H200-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Sony QX1 vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
![Sony QX1 vs Sony H200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Sony QX1 vs Sony H200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Sony-Alpha-QX1-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H200-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Sony QX1 vs Sony H200 Specifications
Sony Alpha QX1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Sony | Sony |
Model | Sony Alpha QX1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
Class | Lens-style | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2014-09-03 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Lens-style | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Bionz X | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.2 x 15.4mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 357.3mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5456 x 3632 | 5184 x 2920 |
Highest native ISO | 16000 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Sony E | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.1-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 20cm |
Crop factor | 1.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | - | 3" |
Screen resolution | 0k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | ClearPhoto LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.80 m |
Flash settings | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 216g (0.48 lbs) | 530g (1.17 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 440 images | 240 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | AA |
Battery model | NP-FW50 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $500 | $250 |