Olympus E-3 vs Sony T900
56 Imaging
45 Features
56 Overall
49
96 Imaging
35 Features
30 Overall
33
Olympus E-3 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Released February 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-1
- Replacement is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Launched February 2009
Olympus E-3 vs Sony T900 Overview
The following is a in-depth comparison of the Olympus E-3 versus Sony T900, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the T900 (12MP) is relatively comparable but the E-3 (Four Thirds) and T900 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor dimensions.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe E-3 was announced 12 months prior to the T900 so they are of a similar generation. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-3 matches up vs the T900 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-3 vs Sony T900 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-3 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-3 Gallery and Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Sony T900
E-3 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus E-3
T900 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2009 | February 2008 | Newer by 12 months | |
Screen sizing | 3.5" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+1") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper screen (+692k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Sony T900
E-3 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focus |
Olympus E-3 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-3 features physical dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") along with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-3 versus Sony T900 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the E-3 against the T900.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-3 and T900 is 56 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to envision the gap in sensor dimensions only by checking out a spec sheet. The image here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-3 and T900.
Clearly, both of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-3 having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Sony T900 will provide more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged E-3 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus E-3 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-3 vs Sony T900 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Released | 2008-02-20 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-10.0 |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inch | 3.5 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 2 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 890 grams (1.96 pounds) | 143 grams (0.32 pounds) |
Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $670 | $300 |